<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ai on James Simas</title><link>https://www.jamessimas.com/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in Ai on James Simas</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.150.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:35:53 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.jamessimas.com/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Using LLMs at Oxide</title><link>https://www.jamessimas.com/links/2026/using-llms-at-oxide/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:35:53 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.jamessimas.com/links/2026/using-llms-at-oxide/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;[&amp;hellip;] LLM-generated prose undermines a social contract of sorts: absent LLMs, it is presumed that of the reader and the writer, it is the writer that has undertaken the greater intellectual exertion. (That is, it is more work to write than to read!) For the reader, this is important: should they struggle with an idea, they can reasonably assume that the writer themselves understands it — and it is the least a reader can do to labor to make sense of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>